Let's outline the downside to poorly balanced sales territories:
That's bad because you may have sales reps who don't have time to maximize sales territory potential (more on sales potential below. Or you have reps who have too much time on their hands and may over-service accounts.
Not all customer accounts are made equal. Some are high-potential and highly profitable. Some (often your bottom 30%) are unprofitable and take up too many resources in both time and effort.
You might hear two scenarios when you view sales territory imbalances from your representative's perspective.
One is, "I love how you designed the sales territory to reward me. It has so much sales potential that I'll be hitting quota easily, without much stress".
The other is, "No matter how hard I work in this sales territory, it will never reward me. There isn't enough sales potential (quality customers and prospects) to earn a viable salary". Neither scenario is ideal for your organization.
If you have sales territory imbalances, your service costs will be higher. Over-servicing comes with a financial penalty.
A simple example would be a rep with a maximum call capacity of 4 sales meetings daily, or 20 per week. Assuming 48 working weeks a year, the maximum workload capacity available is 960 sales meetings.
But, and it is a big but. The rep has 150 accounts to service. And business policy is that every account gets 12 calls per year. That is a workload expectation of 1,800 sales meetings per year or 840 sales meetings the rep cannot attend. Your goal is to ensure that sales rep capacity is balanced. You want to maximize sales territory coverage and revenue while maintaining high customer service levels.
We will use a spreadsheet and tackle a more complex workload calculation, calculating your total sales capacity per rep. Below we added:
NOTE – the spreadsheet will calculate total selling days per year, assuming 35% of a sales rep's time is selling time, and 65% is non-selling time.
You will need to update your rep daily sales capacity.
You now know your annual sales capacity per rep (the maximum number of monthly sales meetings possible).
If you have an account grading system (we are using A, B and C), update the numbers by account type.
Update the number of calls planned by account type. For example, we expect all A accounts to get 12 sales calls yearly.
Advanced sales territory mapping software like eTerritory will calculate your travel time using sophisticated algorithms. If you don’t have a sales territory management tool you can use an estimate for both travel time and call duration (how much time a sales meeting will take)
In the example below, we have added revenue by account type. The spreadsheet will give you an average revenue per hour generated for each account type.
Average revenue per hour provides insight and an opportunity to tweak call frequencies to generate more revenue for a sales territory.
For example, A accounts take up 72% of our sales call time but only generate 50% of our revenue. B accounts use 22% of our sales call time, generating 33% of our revenue. Reducing call frequency for A accounts and increasing it for B accounts should increase sales revenue.
You can develop multiple scenarios as you tweak your call frequencies to create a better workload balance.
NOTE – This rep has a workload imbalance of -94. That’s 94 sales meetings the rep cannot attend. What revenue potential are you losing?
You'll need advanced sales territory mapping or management software like eSpatial. Using sophisticated algorithms, territory mapping software will calculate travel times for you. But you will need to know the call duration and the call frequencies:
Step 1 – Add your territory data
Step 2 – Add a weighted balance
Step 3 – Update your workload index
Step 4 – Decide on the number of sales territories to balance
Step 5 – Optimize and balance
You have achieved your goal of balanced and optimized sales territories. Your alignments are balanced on sales potential and the number of accounts. And you have optimized them based on a workload index.